Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aeonico

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 01:16, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Aeonico[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article has been created before and sent to draft. The creator creating this again in main space makes draftifying this again inappropriate. There is no evidence of notability found within the article or during a search. The relevant guideline here is WP:NCORP, which requires significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject. This fails WP:ORGIND as I could not find any decent independent sources. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:17, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:18, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:18, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:18, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:18, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:18, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:19, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete nothing here suggests this is a notable thing.John Pack Lambert (talk) 12:37, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete — no indication of notability, and cannot find a single source (beyond social media etc.) to even verify this. (Also as an aside: what sort of paid editor takes money for creating an article like this, and doesn't provide a single reference — how long did they expect this to survive, exactly?!) Possibly worth salting as well, seeing as there is clearly determination in getting this published. --DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:19, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Searches return the usual listings but are not showing the coverage needed to demonstrate attained notability. AllyD (talk) 08:41, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I am unable to locate any deep or significant coverage with in-depth information on the company and containing independent content, references to date fail the criteria for establishing notability, topic therefore fails WP:NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺ 12:10, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Per nom, maybe. WP:TOOSOON. --Devoke water 22:34, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.