Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aegaeon (band)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Secret ^account 03:10, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Aegaeon (band)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a nicely presented article about an unsigned band whose records are all self-released. I cannot find any evidence that WP:GNG or WP:BAND are met. — sparklism ^hey! 08:35, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. — sparklism ^hey! 08:37, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Indiana-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:32, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Non notable band. Koala15 (talk) 04:16, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Michaelzeng7 (talk) 17:35, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Appears to fail WP:NBAND. Google News archive search provides one valid source (the other hit is the Wikipedia article) [1], but the depth of coverage is lacking. Google Books provides zero hits for this band. Not finding anything else in terms of reliable sources that cover this band. Northamerica1000^(talk) 01:20, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - they're a sick band with a full-length release and another one coming this year. They have three music videos and tons of press coverage. Plus they've been on national tours with notorious deathcore bands such as King Conquer and Carnifex (band). There is no reason to delete this page if it's just going to most likely get created again in the future and kept anyway. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.225.137.131 (talk) 12:02, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Michaelzeng7 (talk) 19:27, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.