Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adz The Muse

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 19:59, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Adz The Muse[edit]

Adz The Muse (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not a notable person. Google search returns no independent results PlunketMcShane (talk) 18:56, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. PlunketMcShane (talk) 18:56, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. PlunketMcShane (talk) 18:56, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Zimbabwe-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:58, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 18:58, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Charitably it is too soon for an article on this singer. The two sources presently used in the article are her Apple Music entry and another streaming site called Triple J Unearthed. Getting your stuff on a streaming service like everyone else is not a sign of notability. She has none of the necessary media coverage and so far is only found in the typical streaming and social media sites. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 23:46, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom --Devokewater @ 15:08, 19 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. Teraplane (talk) 23:43, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete fails WP:NMUSICIAN / WP:ANYBIO, lacks significant coverage in multiple independent reliable secondary sources. Dan arndt (talk) 09:42, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.