Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Advok8.in

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:40, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Advok8.in[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No coverage in reliable sources at all. All the coverage comes from either advertisements/paid advertisements, or press release. Lacks significant coverage; fails notability guidelines for organizations and companies, as well as general notability criteria.

All the sources provided within the article are clearly paid advertisements for the company's app. Three of which are identical to each-other upto every single word. The "Sarita Magazine" source has a different title, but again the content is identical to the rest of the three, making 4 identical articles. I couldnt read one source, as it was neither in English, nor in Hindi. The launchstory.in is different, but i am not sure about its reliability; looks highly doubtful. —usernamekiran(talk) 16:06, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Update: After nomination, the creator has removed the paid articles from sources. Here is the previous version. Also, one doesnt need to be familiar with hindi language, or Devanagari script; the titles of sources in reflist/references are exactly the same. —usernamekiran(talk) 10:56, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: For future records, the author tried to speedy delete the article under G7. special:diff/835395676 —usernamekiran(talk) 19:21, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. MarginalCost (talk) 22:06, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. MarginalCost (talk) 22:06, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. MarginalCost (talk) 22:06, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Insufficient coverage to prove notability. The COI hasnt been disclosed either and this appears to be an attempt at promoting the company. MT Train^Talk 08:57, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

All the media channels have covered advok8.in voluntarily till now, moreover that language was Kannada which is neither Hindi or English. As soon as we are covered by more media houses they will be cited in the article too. Authenticity is a very subjective matter. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Max shrey (talk • contribs)
copied the comment from talkpage.—usernamekiran(talk) 14:36, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Max shrey: Hi. I wonder if it was voluntary, then how they managed to copy each other to every single word. Anyways, the community will come up with decision through consensus whether to keep the article, or delete it based various wikipedia policies, and guideline. The discussion is going on at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Advok8.in. You can present your side/opinions if you want. But you should also declare in first comment that you are the article creator. Regarding future/upcoming coverage, kindly see WP:CRYSTAL. An article about any subject can be created when the subject meets general notability guidelines. Also kindly see and follow the tips given at WP:COI. And kindly sign the talkpage comments by adding four tildes (~) like this: ~~~~
Best, —usernamekiran(talk) 14:33, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Copied my own reply from Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Advok8.in. I thought it was talkpage of the article. —usernamekiran(talk) 14:39, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails WP:CORP and GNG. Also complete promo. Cesdeva (talk) 16:25, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Promotional article that fails WP:CORP. FITINDIA 19:16, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete plain advert of non notable business. –Ammarpad (talk) 05:45, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete-Clearly advert stuff. Two press releases, citations from own website, and a mention at TOI are not enough — F R ⁺ 10:25, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.