Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adversarial review

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Adversary. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades^Godric 05:51, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Adversarial review[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Clearly not related to science, which has peer review. Not law, which (in the West) employs adversarial process before a neutral. Too vague (and undefined) for politics. Basically an unreferenced article related to a "buzz word" if nothing more. – S. Rich (talk) 15:16, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Added comment – perhaps a WP:BLAR to Adversary is the best solution. – S. Rich (talk) 15:28, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
redirect to Adversary, possibly merge what is referenced and what is unreferenced but non-contested. Staszek Lem (talk) 18:39, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.