Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adventure Game Toolkit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. per WP:SNOW (non-admin closure) CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 07:29, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Adventure Game Toolkit[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of notability, poorly sourced. I was unable to find any online reliable sources. There may be some in print form, or some that I couldn't find. Anarchyte (work | talk) 07:41, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fails WP:NSOFT. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 07:51, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:50, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Softball-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:50, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, or at minimum Merge. Due to the age, one has to switch to searching print magazines and books, and Google Books shows it comes up a good # of times in those searches, though with the snippets available, its hard to tell how much exact context. At minimum it is clearly a searchable term, so a merge, probably to Adventure game as a first suggestion. --MASEM (t) 16:02, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Rebb ing 22:40, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: AGT was kind of a big thing back in the day, yet the impermanence of the early internet produces an unfortunate recentism in cases like this. --pmj (talk) 04:30, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: I agree with the Pmj's comment. This page has value. I added external links establishing notability. --mkepaeg — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mkepaeg (talk • contribs) 01:30, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.