Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Advantages and disadvantages of fuels

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 00:49, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Advantages and disadvantages of fuels[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Essay. I'm choosing AfD in hopes of snow and a quick closure. Drmies (talk) 01:51, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This is a personal essay including original research, and is unreferenced. This is a first contribution by a new user who seems to be acting in good faith. I have welcomed the user and tried to guide them to some of our core policies. However, this article has too many problems to stay now. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 03:11, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Thanks to Cullen above for welcoming the creator, but unless anything here can be sourced, there isn't anything from this article that is salvageable. I, Jethrobot ^{drop me a line} (note: not a bot!) 03:23, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Oops--indeed, thanks Cullen. Drmies (talk) 20:09, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Per the above. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 09:16, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 14:04, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not really an encyclopedia article. Steven Walling • talk 22:26, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Per the above. Beagel (talk) 20:21, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.