Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adulterous Wife: Dizzy

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz talk 02:46, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Adulterous Wife: Dizzy[edit]

Adulterous Wife: Dizzy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A catalog-like entry on a movie that does not meet WP:NFILM as the award is trivial. No encyclopedically relevant prose and no independent RS sources that discuss the topic directly & in detail. Many pages with similar notability issues have been deleted; please see for example: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Widow * Second Wife: Real Sucking Engulfing a Rare Utensil (2nd nomination). K.e.coffman (talk) 04:45, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:46, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 08:04, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 08:06, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: No significant reliable coverage. SL93 (talk) 14:01, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.