Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adrian Fulle

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:57, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Adrian Fulle[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unreferenced WP:BLP with heavy edits by someone with clear WP:COI and promotion. IMDB cannot be used as a sole source D P 16:44, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2014 April 11. —cyberbot I ^Notify_Online 17:02, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Just not finding sufficient coverage. I'm siding, barely, with retention for one of Fulle's films, but even the articles about Love 101 don't do anything more than name-drop Fulle (if that). Especially in light of the more stringent expectations for sourcing BLP articles, I don't see any other option here. Squeamish Ossifrage (talk) 20:22, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I've found just enough to where we could justify keeping the article, although I would suggest that multiple people keep the page on their watchlists to prevent further WP:PUFFERY. I've removed a lot of the article that was unsourced, as well as various different credits and whatnot, as we typically don't list every advert or promo spot that someone does for a company. It's kind of taken for granted that any given production company will have multiple, multiple minor credits to their name that go largely unnoticed by the general public. We generally just list the stuff that's on IMDb and/or have a select filmography. Adding everything that you've ever done (speaking directly to the COI editor) just makes it look promotional- which is something that you should do on your own website, not Wikipedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:12, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:35, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:35, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:35, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: I added a bit to the lede and some sources, and there's plenty more references out there. Definitely WP:NOTABLE. Supernerd11 :D Firemind ^_^ Pokedex 02:06, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.