Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adrian Ables

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Missvain (talk) 01:16, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Adrian Ables[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Same reason as Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ramak Safi, which is how I stumbled across this page also. Adrian Ables played 73 minutes of league soccer (spread across 5 matches) during his very short senior career. No independent significant coverage. Geschichte (talk) 21:13, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:15, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:15, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Oklahoma-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:15, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone 21:21, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - scraping by on NFOOTBALL is insufficient when there is a complete lack of coverage, failing GNG. Giant Snowman 21:30, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete a non-notable soccer player.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:26, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep It's better to have a complete set of articles here for WP:NFOOTBALL than maintain a complete set on another site and a separate incomplete set here. Subject-specific guidelines are more important than WP:GNG as a reason to delete an article, there's no reason to say they shouldn't be as a reason to keep an article. Peter James (talk) 16:55, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - completely and utterly fails WP:GNG; NFOOTBALL is a useful guideline designed to help us decide whether an article is likely to pass GNG. In these sorts of cases where the footballer clearly fails GNG, the borderline passing of NFOOTBALL is irrelevant Spiderone 19:06, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.