Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adnan Virk

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was nomination withdrawn due to an editor ponying up some solid sources. Bearcat (talk) 02:38, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Adnan Virk[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Completely unsourced WP:BLP of a media personality who may or may not actually be the subject of enough media coverage to actually get past WP:GNG — as always with media figures, the mere fact that he is on TV is not sufficient to justify an article that doesn't actually cite proper sources. One problem that hits this particular person on a regular basis is the frequent addition of unsourced nicknames, of both the flattering and unflattering varieties ("Baller", "Captain Canada", etc.) — and while the article has been tagged for both notability and lack of referencing for several months without improvement, there's also an emerging issue with anonymous IPs removing the maintenance tags without actually performing any of the necessary maintenance. As always, I'm willing to withdraw this nomination if actual sourcing can be added — and this nomination represents no prejudice against a future version of the article that does cite proper sources — but a BLP is not entitled to keep an unsourced article just because he exists. Delete if the article is still in its current state by close. Bearcat (talk) 00:49, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 00:54, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:42, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:42, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:42, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete It is high time that all unsourced articles were deleted.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:57, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - I added some citations. Is this better? —Anne Delong (talk) 02:20, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm happy. Consider this withdrawn, and thank you. Bearcat (talk) 02:38, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.