Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adnan Javaid

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:27, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Adnan Javaid[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I have been unable to find any evidence that this person meets WP:POLITICIAN or WP:GNG. Adam9007 (talk) 00:20, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. AmericanAir88^(talk) 00:40, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. AmericanAir88^(talk) 00:40, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. AmericanAir88^(talk) 00:40, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Me neither MaskedSinger (talk) 04:10, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The notability test at WP:NPOL is holding a notable political office, not just being a "senior member" of a political party. So if we can't verify that Adnan Javaid actually held an NPOL-passing role, then he's not entitled to keep an unsourced article just because of what it claims. Bearcat (talk) 12:03, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete the current article is an unreference article on a living person, which we delete because they inherently violate BLP rules of not having unreferenced statements on the living. However, even if we found a reference to substantiate what is said, what is said does not add up to notability. We would need multiple references showing that he is a true mover behind the parties actions and people take notice of his moving of the party, short of that we have no notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:48, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - The article is not sourced dose not meet WP:POLITICIAN is not notable - MA Javadi (talk) 22:30, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Per nom. Unfortunately, the user who created the article has a long history of creating articles that do not meet GNG or project guidelines, then recreates them a few days after they're deleted. StickyWicket (talk) 12:04, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - No reference and nothing found on the Internet - Blake44 (talk) 12:14, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.