Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adnan Haroon

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Consensus is that there is not enough significant, independent coverage of the subject. Google searches do not turn up much additional information. Malinaccier (talk) 05:17, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Adnan Haroon[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not much available for him to prove his notability. Fails WP:GNG. Can be a case for Speedy deletion but I thought discussion would be better. Greenbörg (talk) 09:06, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:02, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:02, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:03, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete no coverage in RS. fails WP:GNG. --Saqib (talk) 11:49, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ks0stm ^{(T•C•G•E)} 00:42, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - winner of a "promotional award" with virtually zero coverage from independent reliable sources. Fails WP:GNG and WP:ENTERTAINER. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 20:40, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - lack of significant coverage in reliable sources. PhilKnight (talk) 23:11, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No verifiable indication that establishes notability under WP:GNG or WP:NFILM. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 23:48, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.