Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Admission Possible

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Yamamoto Ichiro 会話 02:41, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Admission Possible[edit]

Non-notable organization. Article borders on advertisement, is written in a promotional tone (and has been tagged as such since the day it was written), a contains a solitary source link pointing to the founder's bio. Coverage by the New York Times and Business Week is claimed, but no specific source is cited. I waited a while for the author to improve this, but he or she never did. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 19:06, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. KurtRaschke (talk) 19:09, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Written like an advert and appears abandoned. _{WEBURIEDOURSECRETSINTHEGARDEN}^{play it cool.} 19:25, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete - it's written like an advertisement. And it may be a possible copyvio of[1]. - Milk's Favorite Cookie 20:17, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete addishness. Doczilla (talk) 01:04, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.