Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Admiral Beverage

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 16:23, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Admiral Beverage[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Hasn't got much in depth coverage in sources apart from this, barring which all are passing mentions in different local bulletins. Sounds like a mid-level company going by the company website, but there is just no WP:SIGCOV. MT Train^Talk 14:07, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 14:08, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 14:08, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Wyoming-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 14:08, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Interestingly enough, the company appears in a law text ("Hornbook on the Law of Property") on an important point of property law; in a mention of a predecessor acquired by the company; in a master list of major U. S. companies; in an advertisment from a group of employees at a competitor in a Kalispell MT newspaper from 1979, wishing a retiree from Admiral well on his retirement; in a report about a jury case the company won in a 1982 Colorado Springs Gazette issue; in an announcement of a plant openeing in the Billings (MT) Gazette; and, in a 2015 Casper Star Tribune article about the company as Business Hall of Fame winner. Since the latter includes the history of the company, I've added it to the article and done a little copyediting. I think there is enough to satisfy WP:GNG and WP:SIGCOV across the region where the company operates. Geoff | ^{Who, me?} 17:31, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, So Why 11:19, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Zero indications of notability, a run-of-the-mill company with nothing by way of references. The Google Book mentions above by Glane23 are nothing more than mere mentions-in-passing. The rest also fail as there is nothing in-depth written about this company. The references posted above represent the complete sum of Google search results and they all fail WP:CORPDEPTH. Topic completely fails WP:NCORP and GNG. HighKing⁺⁺ 11:04, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- sourcing offered above is insufficient to meet WP:CORPDEPTH. It's WP:SPIP and / or routine as in: "Casper Star Tribune article about the company as Business Hall of Fame winner". K.e.coffman (talk) 02:15, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.