Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AdminiTrack

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 19:44, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AdminiTrack[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Poorly sourced, promotional article about an unremarkable software company. MER-C 13:53, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Ceethekreator (talk) 15:33, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Ceethekreator (talk) 15:33, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Ceethekreator (talk) 15:33, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Georgia (U.S. state)-related deletion discussions. Ceethekreator (talk) 15:33, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, no real claim of notability, so it's borderline CSD. Another company that simply exists, but isn't particularly noteworthy by encyclopedia standards. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 19:36, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Doesn't meet WP:GNG or WP:CORP. I found nothing other than passing mentions. The only source cited in the article does not mention the subject. Not eligible for speedy deletion under A7 due to the "one of the most popular and the most commonly used" claim, but should still be deleted. — Newslinger talk 21:57, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:GNG, WP:SOAP, and WP:NOPRIMARY. Syndicater (talk) 22:24, 13 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.