Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aditya Tiwari

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 17:55, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Aditya Tiwari[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lacks strong sources enough to qualify WP:GNG. There is only a passing mention in the sole reliable source. The other "sources" are just his author profile on various newspaper. This article doesn't qualify : https://www.firstpost.com/living/9-months-indias-youngest-single-dad-aditya-tiwari-on-what-it-takes-to-raise-a-child-with-down-syndrome-4509417.html , apparently talks about a different now-30 year old man also named "Aditya Tiwari", and is written by our Afd Subject Aditya Tiwari.Daiyusha (talk) 10:04, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Daiyusha: This is a wrong URL. Please, check out this link on Firstpost written by the poet and activist in the article. Thank you.--Igallards7 (talk) 11:45, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: The publications that are referenced, are columns in the press media of well-known notoriety in India, which are witten by bloggers and selected by the press team, so not everyone can publish over there. Additionally, he has relative coverage in the media as an LGBT activist and as poet.--Igallards7 (talk) 10:27, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:09, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:09, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:09, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete under G11 and A7. Spam and promotional article. Firstpost article written by him not about him. RationalPuff (talk) 12:11, 21 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete an overly promotional article. Too much of the sourcing is by the article subject. Articles are supposed to be built on independent sources, which means by someone other than the subject.
Delete. Notability, for a writer, is determined not by what they write but by what others write about them. Ifnord (talk) 21:36, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. The article has been improved to encyclopedic standards. References seem to provide independent and sufficient sources on his work. BlueEmeralds (talk) 22:15, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This is a SPA created minutes before just to add this vote. Potentially a sock. RationalPuff (talk) 16:31, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Igallards7 — OwenBlacker (he/him; Talk; please {{ping}} me in replies)
Delete It is a spam and promotional article.VocalIndia (talk) 16:43, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Non notable subject with only passing mentions. Luciapop (talk) 20:09, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.