Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aditya Ojha

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Yunshui ^雲 _水 08:22, 26 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Aditya Ojha[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't see sources that add up to WP:GNG, and it's not clear that WP:NACTOR is met either. There's a bunch of trivial coverage from the Times of India, which isn't a great source. Claims of being a "cricketer" in the opening statement are overstating the subject's involvement in a film-industry amateur cricket league. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 02:33, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 02:33, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 02:33, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 02:33, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The sources aren't notable, the subject dosent seem to meet WP:NACTOR since most of the films are not notable. Antila333 (talk) 07:33, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- article fails WP:GNG for lack of significant coverage in independent reliable sources. The provided references only mention this person without any in-depth coverage. Claim of "Cricketer" is without merit -- this term is reserved for WP:NSPORTS professionals, not hobbyists. — CactusWriter ^(talk) 16:25, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Delete: Following the recent consensus that Times of India is no longer considered a prima facie reliable source, I agree that the article struggles to meet WP:GNG. As for WP:NACTOR, though, it's a bit difficult to determine the notability of productions the subject has been involved with, so I'll happily update my vote if others have any thoughts on that. Dflaw4 (talk) 03:51, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: There are a number of sources which mention him, but I cannot see enough substantive coverage. Tushar.ghone (talk) 13:35, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.