Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adimulapu Suresh

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Withdrawn by nominator. (non-admin closure) | Uncle Milty | talk | 20:42, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Adimulapu Suresh[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is about a politician who doesn't actually appear to be notable. A Google search showed mostly trivial coverage or primary sources. Article is currently a stub, and it doesn't look like it can be expanded. -©2016 Compassionate727^{(Talk)(Contributions)} 16:47, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Vipinhari || talk 18:17, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Vipinhari || talk 18:17, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, as a state legislator he easily passes WP:POLITICIAN. --Soman (talk) 20:38, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - member of a state legislature. Passes WP:POLITICIAN. Vipinhari || talk 07:58, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Verifiable MLA. State legislators pass WP:POLITICIAN. • Gene93k (talk) 14:32, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep Per WP:SKCRIT part 3. Obviously meets WP:NPOLITICIAN. AusLondonder (talk) 20:14, 10 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. The article does need referencing improvement, but if a person is properly verifiable as holding an office that satisfies WP:NPOL — which a seat in the state legislature most assuredly does — then we just flag the article for the necessary improvements and do not delete it outright. The only way an article like this could be deleted is if there were reason to believe it was an outright WP:HOAX — which it demonstrably isn't, because the legislature's website does confirm his membership (although it does raise a question about the correct spelling of his name, since he's listed there as "Audimulapu" rather than "Adimulapu" — but that's not a deletion reason either.) Bearcat (talk) 18:28, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.