Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adhunik

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 11:36, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Adhunik[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unable to locate reliable, independent sources for this subject as outlined at WP:NFSOURCES. VQuakr (talk) 03:42, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Toffanin (talk) 20:36, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Toffanin (talk) 20:36, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Bengali:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

writer/:director:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

producer:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

producer/lead:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

lead:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:INDAFD: Adhunik "Apurba Banerjee" "Kaberi Bagh" "Abhishek Bagh" "Rimjhim Gupta"

Delete per (at best) being TOO SOON. Per WP:INDAFD, the word "Adahunik" gives LOTS of results for some company, but not a Bengali drama series, and the Bengali word "আধুনিক" gives Bengali sources that also appear to NOT be speaking about a drama series. "Apurba Banerjee" gives unrelated results. "Kaberi Bagh" gives no results. "Abhishek Bagh" gives no results. "Rimjhim Gupta" IS an actress, but no news is found in connection with this project. All that is found is the created social media page which is not RS. Being unverifiable, it misses out on WP:NF by a wide margin. If or when this ever gets coverage in acceptable sources, an return might be considered. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 03:17, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —☮JAaron95 ^Talk 14:50, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as there's simply nothing to suggest improvement. SwisterTwister talk 05:35, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.