Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adhara Observatory UFO Lunar Transit
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 01:47, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Adhara Observatory UFO Lunar Transit[edit]
- Adhara Observatory UFO Lunar Transit (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non-notable event. Google news has zero hits, web hits show only non-reliable sources or pages related to the Wikipedia page, books has no hits, as does scholar. The one reference that is linked in the article is to a non-RS, which has only one paragraph on the event. Article does not rely on reliable, third-party published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. Fails WP:V. Atmoz (talk) 16:49, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom.
Other editors might find better luck searching under variants of the observatory's name (not clear that "Adhara" is the correct spelling),but I'm not finding any reliable sources under anything I search for. Baileypalblue (talk) 22:32, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep I have added a reliable source with images. Q Science (talk) 08:32, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- That's a step forward. I don't know that it's a reliable source, but it does have a references section; if someone were to confirm that those references discuss the event, that would be enough to satisfy WP:FRINGE. Baileypalblue (talk) 20:59, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete very minor event indeed, even by the standards of UFOlogy. I consider the likelihood of any RSs very low.DGG (talk) 02:44, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete no RSes, nn; if I take fuzzy photos do I get to have articles here too? Carlossuarez46 (talk) 18:02, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Paranormal-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 23:17, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Ain't no Roswell.--Peephole (talk) 02:14, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.