Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adem Ayral

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Vanamonde (Talk) 10:12, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Adem Ayral[edit]

Adem Ayral (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Some coverage but I couldn't find enough to show he meets WP:NACTOR or WP:GNG. Has been in CAT:NN for 12 years; hopefully we can now resolve this. It doesn't have a Turkish article, but has in two other languages, neither of which have convincing evidence of notability. I may be missing something due to language. Boleyn (talk) 09:47, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:31, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:31, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete; roles seem to be bit parts and no SIGCOV to satisfy notability. – DarkGlow • 11:26, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Fails NACTOR and SIGCOV. I found a passing mention here about him directing Bücür Cadı (tr), but that's it. ~StyyxTalk? ^-^ 14:03, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete for the same reasons I PRODded it in December. Likely missed the dePROD or I'd have AfDed myself. Star Mississippi 23:17, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Is notable and references prove it, I would recreate article if it was deleted as there are enough sources and references. Nine individual sources are referenced. BookwormbilgeliK (talk) 03:28, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
user:BookwormbilgeliK, it isn't acceptable to just unilaterally recreate if articles are deleted at AfD. You give your opinion here, and accept the general consensus, even if you disagree with it. Boleyn (talk) 10:40, 16 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.