Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adela Cojab

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:20, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Adela Cojab[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:SIGCOV and WP:BIO. References are very poor for a WP:BLP scope_creep^Talk 17:44, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, Women, Judaism, Israel, Canada, and Mexico. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:53, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:05, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Not a simple one as this scratches naotability, however, it is BLP and a student-activist. While not all student activists are NN, such BLPs should be handled with care. Given the borderline notability, it is best to delete this entry right now as WP:TOOSOON, recognizing that current near-notability does count if in the future Cojab will remain so much in the public eye. In other words, she's almost there. gidonb (talk) 22:51, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.