Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adeism
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete, consensus is that the article is a neologism. Davewild (talk) 17:35, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Adeism[edit]
- Adeism (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non-notable neologism, dicdef at best. Fails WP:V. Ravenswing 09:56, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as neologism (although I do quite like it as a term). Couldn't find any relaible sources. Blackmetalbaz (talk) 12:27, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as a unverifyable (from multiple sources) neologism. - Peripitus (Talk) 12:40, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Even if it weren't a neologism, WP:Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Plasticup T/C 16:09, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Does this term really exist? I don't think so and therefore it is definitely WP:NEO. --Grrrlriot (talk) 00:54, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.