Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Addison Rerecich

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. There appears to be consensus that the content should be kept. A discussion about whether a move/amendment to turn it into an event page can take place on the talk page (non-admin closure) Nosebagbear (talk) 09:40, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Addison Rerecich[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NNEWS. » Shadowowl | talk 15:23, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 16:40, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arizona-related deletion discussions. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 16:40, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as subject of extensive coverage in reliable sources and as a rare and precedent-setting medical case. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 16:42, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It is a 1-time event. This article also fails WP:BLP1E. » Shadowowl | talk 17:27, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Easily passes WP:GNG. There are four articles on the subject in tucson.com in the top ten Google searches for crying out loud, and that is a reliable source that is independent of the subject. Was the subject of a 2013 episode of Frontline so meets WP:DEPTH (countering the NOTNEWS claim). Since there are a sufficient number of references, and Shadowowl raised BLP1E which states that "if the event is notable, then an article usually should be written about the event instead", shall I assume the intent is to move the article to one focusing on the event rather than the person and we should be having a move discusison rather than an AfD? Walter Görlitz (talk) 17:49, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep the coverage about her is more than trivial, so meets WP:GNG rather than being a case of WP:BLP1E. Joseph2302 (talk) 19:00, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.