Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Addiction Apparel

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 19:14, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Addiction Apparel[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is not a notable company. It was started just last month. The article was written by someone with an admitted conflict of interest (cousin of the business owner) and the article has been edited by the owner of the business as well. The sources used in the article are not independent or reliable (except the New York Times reference, which doesn't even mention the company at all). May qualify for speedy deletion as well: WP:CSD#A7. Peacock (talk) 11:40, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. S.G.^(GH) _ping! 16:34, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:20, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:20, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:20, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - a clear case of WP:TOOSOON. Mabalu (talk) 22:06, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. — LeoFrank ^Talk 03:22, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.