Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Addi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was merge with Luke 3. —Cleared as filed. 22:20, 28 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Addi[edit]

Delete. Non-notable person, and a dicdef - CloudedIce 03:29, 17 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with Luke 3. Ice, please put more effort into your nominations: this is nothing more than a vote. A good nomination is an argument for why the article should be deleted; a bad nomination is a vote: "delete, non-notable". Good nominations are preferred. Help make AfD work better! fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 13:16, 17 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with Jesus genealogy page Sethie 06:47, 24 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

RELISTED NOVEMBER 28, 2005, PLEASE ADD NEW VOTES BELOW THIS NOTICE' Jtkiefer^{T | C | @} ---- 00:39, 28 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

comment relisted due to having only 3 votes at time of close. Jtkiefer^{T | C | @} ---- 00:41, 28 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Merge. --Nlu 00:46, 28 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - I think I have a suggestion for why there's been so few votes. The whole thing is confusing! All I got out of it was that Addi was someone's son and someone's father. I think he is probably a part of that whole section where they talk about people begatting each other. But I don't understand it enough to know whether to keep it outright or merge it. Zordrac 02:49, 28 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with Luke 3, as suggested in earlier voting. Joyous | Talk 02:57, 28 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Merge per all the above. At least the resulting redirect will provide anyone searching for this person with context. Biblical people with only one mention, don't deserve their own article. - Mgm|^(talk) 10:38, 28 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Am I the only one to think that this really doesn't provide any information, whether put with another article or not? It's a Who's Who in the Bible entry, and any Bible one reads with any apparatus at all will identify the proper nouns. What on earth is someone doing looking for this little information in an encyclopedia? Geogre 15:54, 28 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.