Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adani Enterprises

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Shaji issac (talk) 01:24, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Adani Enterprises[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article should be merged to Adani Group#Adani Enterprises. No special article needed because there is a main article about Adani Group. Shaji issac (talk) 13:20, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shaji issac (talk) 13:20, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shaji issac (talk) 13:20, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shaji issac (talk) 13:20, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Earlier I was skeptical and was not sure about the difference between the two - Adani Group and Adani Enterprises. But, after following and participating in the discussion at Talk:Adani Group, I realized... the attempt by editor Pillechan is acceptable under the following conditions; WP:NCORP, WP:LISTED, WP:SIGCOV, WP:RS. And as per my understanding,the enterprises is a listed holding company of the group and it seems to be independent from other Adani listed companies.If anyone has a different opinion, then I'm open for it too. - Hatchens (talk) 16:16, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep:There is no point to suggest merging this with Adani Group as this entity is independly notable. Passes both WP:LISTED and WP:NCORP quite easily

1.News reference as per WP:RS - [1],

2.The independent analyst reports as per WP:LISTED- [2],

3.Significant coverage as per WP:SIGCOV in a book - [3]. Several other sources are there in the article giving enough sigcov to the company. Pillechan (പിള്ളേച്ചനോട് പറ) 16:25, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.