Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adams-Toman

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 08:16, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Adams-Toman[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article on a company has been without sources for the preceding 14 years. A BEFORE on JSTOR, Google News, Google Books, and newspapers.com fails to locate any. Fails GNG. (In principal, have no problem with Draftify if someone were to want to take ownership of sourcing it.) Chetsford (talk) 20:48, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment this directory from 1929 proves it existed, but probably isn't enough for notability. power~enwiki (π, ν) 20:51, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. GameInfirmary Talk 21:14, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. GameInfirmary Talk 21:14, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Does not meet WP:NCORP. Proof of existance does not equal notability. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:51, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Agree with nom and above, fails NCORP and GNG. HighKing⁺⁺ 14:52, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above, couldn't find indepth coverage. --GRuban (talk) 17:16, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.