Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adamadult

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus that this retailer fails WP:GNG. Just Chilling (talk) 18:28, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Adamadult[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't appear to be notable. Only references are press-releases (in Chinese), not substantial independent coverage. power~enwiki (π, ν) 17:34, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:18, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete insufficient sourcing to establish WP:GNG. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 14:03, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No reliable sources of any kind found. Fails WP:RS. Lapablo (talk) 21:10, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.