Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam Tuck
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Lancaster Herald. Liz Read! Talk! 22:36, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
Adam Tuck[edit]
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Adam Tuck (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article was redirected to Lancaster Herald (where he has a mention and photo) but was reverted on the argument that all other Lancaster Herald of Arms holders have a Wikipedia. Maybe the others are notable for other things, but Adam Tuck scores zero on the Google radar, other than a mention in relation to the coronation of the king. A redirect would be a quite fair action, in my opinion. Sionk (talk) 20:55, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and England. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 21:06, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
- Redirect as above. Doesn't meet GNG - no inherent notability for heralds... Ingratis (talk) 05:45, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.