Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam Steiner

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 00:20, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Adam Steiner[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Steiner doesn't appear to satisfy WP:NACTOR or WP:GNG. Clarityfiend (talk) 07:56, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:NNC and the sources extension of WP:GNG. I don't generally like to fall all the way back onto the root GNG for a delete !vote but it is quite clear about sourcing and "coverage". WP:NACTOR is less of a factor if we are to take the claims in the article at face value and might warrant further discussion regarding precedent of similar articles, however these are entirely unverifiable and drags us back to GNG and BLP matters. ♪ Tstorm (talk) 08:55, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:02, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:02, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Michig (talk) 07:32, 8 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, no references proving notability. (Actually, no references at all.) --GRuban (talk) 15:53, 8 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.