Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam Starks

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Discounting sockpuppetry. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:17, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Adam Starks[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of any notability. All the many maintenance banners have been removed but none of the issues fixed. No reliable and independent sources, no demonstrable evidence of notability. Almost qualifies for speedy deletion. Fails WP:GNG by a country mile. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 22:10, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 22:10, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 22:10, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete As it stands this is WP:SELFPROMOTION. This person may become notable one day. If that happens a new article can be created. MarnetteD|Talk 22:27, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Again this one could be stub worthy, he has a movie, but this isn't a stub. This is a biography where I have to read about his time in the construction industry. Could fly with a 2-3 sentence just the facts stub. Coffeeluvr613 (talk) 23:03, 5 July 2019 (UTC) Blocked sockpuppet. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:49, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 01:57, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 01:57, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep This article is worthy of a stub only, he has a couple of movies and some citations but more are needed. JPC1990|Talk 09:19, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Some notability but many more sources are needed. Greenunion97|Talk 10:36, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Administrator note Greenunion97 is a sockpuppet of JPC 1990 created to vote in this debate. ST47 (talk) 09:57, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Self-promotion. Andy Dingley (talk) 10:07, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NOTPROMO.E.M.Gregory (talk) 13:47, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - How is this run of the mill actor meeting WP:NACTOR? Bearian (talk) 19:09, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. The sock activity above can skew the argument. AmericanAir88^(talk) 17:36, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete lacks WP:SIGCOV. The article is written in a promotional tone. Masum Reza^📞 03:05, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails WP:NACTOR and to me reads as a borderline A7, almost. Red Phoenix ^talk 14:01, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.