Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam Rom
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 18:15, 31 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Adam Rom[edit]
- Adam Rom (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:PORNBIO and the GNG. No nontrivial GNews or GBooks hits. Scene award, by established consensus, would not contribute to notability even if the award were notable. No reliably sourced biographical content. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 21:43, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:55, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:55, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Fails PORNBIO with just one scene-related award. Fails GNG with no significant coverage about him, just a couple of trivial mentions, the most significant of which appears to be the sentence: "...His favorite partner is Adam Rom, a rather Mitchumesque hunk who performs with an air of blithe obligation.", from an U-T San Diego article. Not enough to pass the notability bar. Cavarrone (talk) 11:14, 25 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete fails relevant notability rules.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:17, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.