Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam Parker

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 06:38, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Adam Parker[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete: promotional hagiography. Belongs on Facebook or LinkedIn, not here. Quis separabit? 05:15, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep A Google search for "Adam Parker Morgan Stanley" yields extensive coverage in a wide range of reliable sources. Far better to expand and improve this article than to delete it. I do not find the current version of the article excessively promotional. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 05:54, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is a blatant vanity page with resume. It's absurd that it's lasted this long. Quis separabit? 00:27, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:TNT. The current article is a close paraphrase of part of the subject's profile on the Morgan Stanley website. It's probably just not close enough to qualify for G11 speedy deletion. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 12:04, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 23:11, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Basically condensed resume. Sources are primarily about subject's views or quotes, not about the subject himself. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 01:04, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.