Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam Murciano
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:20, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Adam Murciano[edit]
- Adam Murciano (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log) • Afd statistics
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Subject appears to fail the notability guidelines at WP:NACTOR - the one role made the most about here appears from his IMDB listing to be a single episode appearance quite low on the cast list. The other acting roles are "extra" or "atmosphere"-type roles. Nat Gertler (talk) 22:30, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- -- Cirt (talk) 22:47, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Way too few and minor acting credits. Clarityfiend (talk) 23:40, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- delete per failing WP:NACTOR. WildHorsesPulled (talk) 23:51, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- Jclemens-public (talk) 01:35, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:TOOSOON. Shortness of career and lack of coverage seal this one's fate. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 02:53, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 (Contact) 17:08, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.