Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam Matta

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Carolina Chocolate Drops. And merge from history as consensus may determine.  Sandstein  20:30, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Adam Matta[edit]

Adam Matta (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NMUSIC and WP:GNG. Notability is not inherited; there is a mention of the subject in the band's article. Not a single third party independent source provided, and none found. Scr★pIronIV 22:42, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment - This is Jaron. all of the inline citations i've added to the page were from 3rd party sources. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jaron Felix Patton (talk • contribs) 22:45, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    • Redirect to Carolina Chocolate Drops and merge as needed, as the article is still questionable overall with nothing else convincing. I would hope anyone boldly starting this again if ever would be smart before any such actions. Delete as I found nothing better at all. SwisterTwister talk 22:49, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 22:50, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment -As i said all of the references i've added were from third party independant sources that were not made by the artist.
  • Delete fails WP:GNG.--Michiquito (talk) 01:39, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - lead member of an award-winning band. At worse, redirect. Bearian (talk) 19:56, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Note to Jaron Felix Patton The references, whether 3rd party or not, are trivial or promotional in tone and therefore do not convey notability. The first two references are paragraph-styled laundry lists of achievements, not unlike someone's resume on their LinkedIn profile. The third reference, a listing of photos of the subject, is irrelevant. The fourth reference is a promotional article from the subject's record label's blog--itself promotional in purpose--and therefore cannot be considered independent. Note to user Bearian: I agree it is acceptable to redirect to the Carolina Chocolate Drops page but I disagree that the subject is independently notable apart from this band. ShelbyMarion (talk) 14:52, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge to Carolina Chocolate Drops. Sources exist, although I didn't find enough to justify a standalone article: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5]. --Michig (talk) 06:58, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 20:37, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Music1201 talk 21:34, 7 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Hello this is Jaron, I was able to find more 3rd party sources that indicate notability, Please check them and see if they work. if not i'll try to find more, and if that fails then i guess we would need to take it down. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jaron Felix Patton (talk • contribs) 23:56, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 11:01, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, or redirect per above. The new references are all still trivial. Just seems to fail WP:GNG at this point. Maybe in the future. –Compassionate727 (T·C) 11:12, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - I would normally push for a biographical article to be kept and reworked, but this really doesn't hold up to WP:MUSICBIO - most of the references are not notable on their own, and at least one source is a college newspaper. Garchy (talk) 14:11, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Adam_Matta&oldid=1089512201"