Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam Lark

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:44, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Adam Lark[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG, as all sources are not independent of the subject, or are authored by the subject. A WP:BEFORE search produced no suitable sources. JML1148 (talk | contribs) 05:12, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Academics and educators, United States of America, and Ohio. JML1148 (talk | contribs) 05:12, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails WP:Prof#C1 by a long way. Nothing else for GNG. Xxanthippe (talk) 05:19, 3 June 2023 (UTC).[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 07:06, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as not passing GNG nor any of the NPROF criteria. --Mvqr (talk) 11:52, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Citation record shows no pass of WP:PROF, nor is any other form of notability evident. —David Eppstein (talk) 07:30, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:GNG and WP:PROF.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 17:38, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.