Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam Henrich

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Ben · Salvidrim! ✉ 16:34, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Adam Henrich[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:NHOCKEY and WP:GNG Joeykai (talk) 08:36, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 11:57, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 11:58, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 11:58, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Judaism-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 11:59, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete does not meet notability guidelines for hockey players.John Pack Lambert (talk) 23:37, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep does appear to meet WP:NHOCKEY. According to [1], 189 American Hockey League games (187 regular season, 2 post-season) and 11 Deutsche Eishockey Liga games. That is 200, so it is met. Considering the last time he played in one of those two leagues it was almost 10 years ago, finding sources from a google search may prove difficult. Due to the time distance from the prime of this subject, I think we let the presumption hold that if we look hard enough (e.g., go through hard newspaper archives), we would find sources. Therefore, keep. RonSigPi (talk) 19:29, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I looked at this again. Another reason for keep is he was the top pick that year from Tampa Bay. I know it was not round one, but it was round two and not like round five. In a draft, often times the top pick of a team is covered in the regional press. If there is no first round pick, they will just cover the second round pick that was picked first. To put another way, newspapers have space for interest stories on the top new player reserved by an organization. Whoever that top player is gets coverage - otherwise the paper would have blank space. Since this event is 2002, I think it will be hard to find those stories online 15 or so years later, but another point to consider for keep. RonSigPi (talk) 14:30, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:53, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: I think Adam sneaks through. He does meet point #2 of NHOCKEY, having played 200 games between the AHL and DEL. His early career received fairly substantial coverage. The article needs a lot of work, but I think it merits inclusion. – Nurmsook! ^talk... 17:30, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Barely passes NHOCKEY criterion #2. Rlendog (talk) 16:39, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.