Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam Henley (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete G4 - no change since last AFD, however if he does ever play for the first team it will merit restoration Ϣere SpielChequers 17:21, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Adam Henley[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:ATHLETE requires that a footballer must have played a competitive first-team match for a professional club to be notable. This player has not done that; being named as a substitute is not enough. – Pee Jay 10:25, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. – Pee Jay 10:29, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:NSPORTS and WP:GNG J Mo 101 (talk) 10:36, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - I have nothing relevant to add, but born 1994? That's a bit scary, isn't it? ArtVandelay13 (talk) 10:38, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I think I'll be most worried when we start seeing professionals born in the 2000s!!! – Pee Jay 10:43, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete per WP:CSD#G4 / Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam Henley. Nothing has changed from previous discussion which resulted in delete. Cannonbolt2 (talk) 11:26, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete - nothing has changed since last time and I've tagged it accordingly. Giant Snowman 14:20, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.