Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam Emirali

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Daniel (talk) 23:33, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Adam Emirali[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A barely-sourced biography on a rugby player with no claim to passing WP:NRU and no evidence of passing WP:GNG either; in my searches, the only mention of him anywhere seems to be in someone's Wordpress blog! The article was created in 2013 by someone called Jem Emirali, who is likely a close relation to the subject of the article. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:17, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:18, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:18, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Rugby union-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:18, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cyprus-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:18, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Per nom, international appearances for Cyprus non-notable under WP:NRU and no professional appearances either. Fails GNG also as there's no real neutral coverage of the player either. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 09:10, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.