Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam Davenport
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was KEEP. postdlf (talk) 12:19, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Adam Davenport[edit]
- Adam Davenport (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not appear to be notable Eeekster (talk) 19:53, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Seems to be receiving sufficient coverage to establish notability, e.g. [1], [2], [3], [4]. RichardOSmith (talk) 20:09, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Article clearly establishes why subject is significant or important. --Cinetar (talk) 21:15, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:47, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep article and Wikipedia will benefit from expansion and additional sourcing... but not through deletion. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 04:23, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eduemoni↑talk↓ 03:14, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply] - The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.