Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam Dalziel

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. Owen× ☎ 21:21, 4 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Adam Dalziel[edit]

Not-notable, vanity. Google gets 230 hits on "Adam Dalziel", but of the first 20 only 4 are for this Adam Dalziel, and 3 of those are from Wikipedia or a site pulling from WP. -- Dalbury^(Talk) 01:28, 29 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. See also deletion nomination for Model Motion. -- Dalbury^(Talk) 01:35, 29 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - not notable. 147.70.242.21 01:50, 29 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete - if we were to keep one, it'd be the place Model Motion. You can't be notable for creating something unless the thing you have created is notable. LOL. So see if he can establish whether Model Motion is notable first, and if so, consider keeping that one. Don't consider keeping this. Zordrac 09:45, 29 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Apparently I can't say "speedy" because of the criteria for speedy deletion. Zordrac 18:52, 29 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: ur remote control to the delete button: not apparently very significant in the fashion or South Beach worlds, and his site is a portal. Geogre 12:19, 29 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above arguments. Punkmorten 22:36, 3 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.