Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam Blampied (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was already speedily deleted by User:Cullen328. Metropolitan90 (talk) 04:10, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Adam Blampied[edit]

Adam Blampied (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable entertainer/ personality etc. The only near-WP:RS available are those I have provided- one NJEP article and one from the Irish Mirror. So one local, one tabloid. But neither provide the necessary in-depth or persistence of coverage required to even pass the basic requirements for WP:ANYBIO. The only other available sources are from his employer/company ([1]), which are wholly self-published, and per WP:PST, unsuitable as standalone refernces, particularly in the context of a WP:BLP. — fortunavelut luna 12:23, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 12:58, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 15:58, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy delete. I'm not sure whether this article is the same as the previously deleted one. I think I remember something a bit more grandiose. Assuming this doesn't fall on that criterion, it fails on notability. Whatculture doesn't even have an article. Its wresting promotion did have an article but that got deleted at least once. Nothing here is notable. --DanielRigal (talk) 17:35, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.