Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Action Palestine

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 01:38, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

Action Palestine

Action Palestine (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Reasons for deletion: Cannot meet sourcing standards per Wikipedia:Reliable sources, content is not suitable for an encyclopedia, per Wikipedia:NOT, articles fails to meet notability guidelines per Wikipedia:NOT, POV is obviously a major issue here. Also fails Wikipedia:CORP. I'm more then willing to edit this article and create a balance, but I can't seem to find anything online to support such edits. Wikifan12345 (talk) 02:14, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

Creating deletion discussion page for Action Palestine

• Weak Delete Big POV problem. Seems some parts are little more than propoganda. The article is made solely from cut and paste from the Action Palestine website. I think given some work it could be better, but as it stands it is not encyclopaedic. Beligaronia (talk) 19:26, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

• Delete This article has so many problems I don't know where to start - WP:ORG - does not appear to pass thresholds on notability looking at third party resources (This is a fundamental problem). Other issues that need to be addressed include: WP:COPYVIO from the organization's website, WP:SPAM this article is really just a promotional piece for this organization and WP:POV - clearly written by someone affiliated with the organization and the article would require a complete rewrite to get to neutrality.|► ϋrбanяeneωaℓ • TALK ◄| 04:29, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
  • Comment It was written by the organisation. The text is completely cut and paste from the official website.--Beligaronia (talk) 08:40, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.