Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Action Gamemaster

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was No Consensus Redwolf24 (talk) 06:26, 25 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Action Gamemaster[edit]

Non-notable vaporware console that was only announced, never actually developed. BackInBlack 01:16, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete There is nothing notable about a product that never existed. Might be properly mentioned in the article about the corporation that failed to produce it, Active Enterprises. Ande B 03:12, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above Tom Harrison ^Talk 03:20, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Vaporware from an obscure outfit that only came out with one mediocre product before the owners went off to sell cars instead? Derezz this puppy ... err, Delete per nom. RGTraynor 14:39, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete vaporware from minor manufacture of unlicensed games - I don't think it gets a lot less notable than that. Just zis Guy you know? 15:20, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I have searched for information on this topic before. It might not be notable to you but it is to at least me. --ReptileLawyer 18:57, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The entry is encyclopedic, and could be the perfect article. History like this should be recored. Meta:Wiki is not paper McKay 23:01, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Excellent, well-researched article. Why on earth delete it? Richard W.M. Jones 08:49, 21 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Active Enterprises with full honours. Kind of infamous "item" among people interested of game system history, but really, due to lack of evidence, it's just a ghost story, and not even a substantially creepy one at that. Can't possibly justify it's existence as a separate article unless something substantial shows up, like actual prototypes or something, but since the AE article is a bit short, it could use some meat. --wwwwolf (barks/growls) 18:59, 21 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Notable and well written. There are several unreleased or protoype consoles that have their own articles (such as the Sega Neptune) so I don't see why this cannot have its own article either.--Cini 17:49, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.