Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Acsiopolis
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 00:28, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
Acsiopolis[edit]
- Acsiopolis (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Meets neither WP:GNG nor WP:NGEO. Also violates WP:CRYSTAL. ubiquity (talk) 15:14, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
- Delete; I concur with nom. I was the one who initially PRODed the article. The tag was later removed by the article creator. I have to add Elismarie Botha appears to be Marketing Manager at Anaprop, the developers of Acsiopolis. Absolutely non-notable. See also The Leonardo (Sandton). Best, FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 16:36, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 16:44, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 16:44, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
- Delete, does not meet WP:NGEO, also is WP:PROMOTION and WP:TOOSOON. Coolabahapple (talk) 16:47, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
- Delete per above. KGirlTrucker81 talk what I'm been doing 19:52, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Article about a building that isn't built yet.--Savonneux (talk) 20:48, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 21:47, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. North America1000 07:41, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.