Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Acronym Finder

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Consensus is that notability is satisfied, the nom. seems to be neutral after attempting a WP:HEY. (non-admin closure) ∰Bellezzasolo✡ Discuss 11:18, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Acronym Finder[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability cannot be established via third party sources. All citations reference the website itself or a fleeting mention of it except one. Gotitbro (talk) 21:32, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 10:17, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have updated the page myself to try and establish notability. Please see if it is still eligible for deletion. Gotitbro (talk) 04:17, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Sufficient uses to indicate notability . DGG ( talk ) 04:28, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Notable per DGG. Satisfies GNG. James500 (talk) 06:57, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, refs look typical for this kind of website. Szzuk (talk) 07:19, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.