Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Acrobator.com

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. joe decker ^{talk to me} 15:27, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Acrobator.com[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of notability, coi Studerby (talk) 07:41, 4 April 2012 (UTC) As to COI, the article creator is User:Margarita_Stukova, who is on the team at this company. Studerby (talk) 07:48, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I am, but being in the team of a company doesnt mean that there is no evidence of notability of the company itself, does it? Margarita

True, COI doesn't logically imply lack of notability; however (a) in the "normal" case where the article creator has no COI, there's a converse implication, that the article topic was somehow notable or interesting enough to cause an unaffiliated person to create the article, leading to a "benefit of a doubt", and (b) while there's no logical implication, there's a very high observed correlation between lack of notability at creation and someone with a conflict of interest trying to promote something. Studerby (talk) 15:22, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Fails WP:GNG, no reliable sources are present in the article, and searching turned up nothing as well. The company was supposedly founded in 2012 so if the company grew quickly enough to meet the notability requirements I'd imagine that in itself would be notable, making such reliable sources easier to find. However, I wasn't able to find anything outside of social networking profiles. - Sudo Ghost 08:42, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as above, advertising/promotional. In response to Margarita, notability isn't directly influenced because you're an employee, but it does suggest the possibility that the article was created to promote or advertise the company which is against Wikipedia policy Wikipelli ^Talk 15:05, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:32, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Spam COI article written by the same SPA who wrote the one on the company's founder. No notability. Softlavender (talk) 05:52, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Wikipelli. Bearian (talk) 00:17, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.