Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Acoustic Verses

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. – Joe (talk) 09:47, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Acoustic Verses[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

Acoustic Verses (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of notability per WP:NALBUM and it did not appear on the charts. ... discospinster talk 22:07, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. ... discospinster talk 22:07, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions. ... discospinster talk 22:07, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep This is a good article. Well referenced and about a major studio album in the context of underground metal. Even powerful pages like Blabbermouth, Allmusic and Metal Storm praise it. Why delete it? --Apega71 (talk) 23:49, 29 December 2020 (UTC)--Apega71 (talk) 23:51, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Two more reviews not yet referenced in PopMatters [1] and Exclaim! [2]. Coin (talk) 05:04, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep The article was enriched with more references and reviews of specialized pages. --Chavitico (talk) 13:25, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep As per all above. Pilean (talk) 10:13, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep: The sources in the article are reliable (except Discogs), and so are the ones indicated by Coin. I also found some more reliable sources about the album: [3], [4], [5] and [6]. That said, the article is good enough to pass WP:NALBUM. ASTIG😎 (HAPPY NEW YEAR!) 17:00, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Sputnikmusic and MetalReviews.com aren't RS according to WP:MUSICRS (from user not staff) and Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_319#Is_Metalreviews.com_a_reliable_source. Coin (talk) 02:52, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment I would like to see those voting keep expand the article based on the sources they found. HĐ (talk) 02:54, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment I agree with the last comment. It seems that it is unanimously decided that this article keep. Now it is up to the other users to improve or expand the content. If they want to do it, obviously haha! --Apega71 (talk) 01:56, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Acoustic_Verses&oldid=998638407"